Pacioli is being considered the father of the Accounting. The first double entry book-keeping was developed around 1200 B.C in Italy followed by first book on double entry was written by Luca Pacioli in 1494. Due to the advent of Industrial Revolution around 1750, business expanded rapidly which catapulted mass transportation, invention of new products and new markets, development of capital markets and as the result, the role of accountant become inevitable to any industry.
As development of trade grows, the need for professional accountants also nurtured in a fast pace. Society of Accountants was established in 1854 in Edinburg which was accorded a royal charter which recognized the professions role in the trade and commerce. In U.S, the first such professional society was the American Association of Public Accountants, chartered by the state of New York in 1887. Cost accounting was developed to augment the efficiency in the manufacturing Units. Management Accounting was developed to advise the business to make strategic business decisions.
During 20th Century, United States has overtaken the British and become the leading industrial power in the world. The growth of industries like U.S. steel and Standard Oil demanded more classy accounting systems to keep track record of expanding business divisions within these huge business corporations. As insiders of the industry took advantages by stock manipulations, price fixing and other questionable business practices mainly to derive benefits thereby depriving the interest of gullible investors.
All the states of the U.S.A and Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia stipulates through law that an accountant should have specific educational and experience requirements and should passes an qualifying examination and will be granted a title known as Certified Public Accountants. [CPA]. Now, CPAs have structured in to State and national societies.
In United States, American Institute of Certified is the prime body representing accounting profession, which is the contemporary successor organization of the American Association of Public Accountants and the American Accounting Association organized in 1916. In United States , the Financial Accounting Standards Boards [ FASB] , an independent non-governmental organization supported by financial-reporting industry groups , is the nodal institution accountable for establishing accounting standards and rules whereas the International Accounting Standards Boards [ IASB] formulates rules and standards that are recognized and used by many nations.
With fast growth of corporate activity, the need for sophisticated accounting methods has increased and accounting has witnessed many improvements in theory and techniques. The ever changing tax laws and regulations is causing change in accounting methods frequently as it is necessary to maintain homogeneous accounts for governmental statutory requirements or public scrutiny.
A series of exposures pertaining to accounting firms failure to detect or openly challenge irregularities or fraud as in the case of World.com and Enron, when auditing finances of a number of corporations compelled Congress to establish the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in 2002. Securities and Exchange Commission has been allocated power to appoint the above board to register and regulate accountants and firms to act as auditors. It sets standards for auditing and is responsible for reviewing audits and disciplining accountants and accounting firms. 
Accounting standards are significant as they guarantee improved public accountability and offer effective and efficient functioning of the trade and commerce of a nation. They play a vital role for complete understanding of political, economical and social consequences of allocation and proper utilization of government resources both at the federal and at the State levels. Improper and bad accounting may lead to serious long term consequences .Accounting standards can be misused to offer misleading information of a business.
It refers to a method applied by private sector wherein creation of an economic market in which business is ruled by the laws of supply and demand and not by the unwanted government interference, subsidy or regulation.
Under this accounting standard, voluntary disclosure of activity -based cost data which offers a new approach of functional process and provides more alternatives for decision makers. In a real free market, accounting standards would enhance as corporations and accountants vie to offer the best information to shareholders.
In a free market, the aspiration for profit is satisfied by long-range, honest, rational behavior thereby innovating, by employing best employees, by offering quality products and by providing accurate information to investors.
Business is required to provide accurate information to investors else it would loose its reputation and credibility in the market. The current FASB is so cumbersome and complex that an ordinary lay man finds it difficult to interpret the same. Most companies in U.S.A now started to follow dual reporting. For instance, AMD and Intel release two sets of accounting reports: one as per FASB guidelines which is mandated by the regulation and other based on simple accounting standards that they deem that it being more informative to shareholders.
There are certain existing statues which refuse the shareholders to overthrow existing corrupt or incompetent management. For instance, Anti-hostile takeover legislation which was passed in 1968 has made it complex to replace incompetent management .Arcane regulations passed in 1930 limit the capacity of the financial entities such as insurance companies, pension funds and mutual funds that own major shareholding in corporations to participate in the board for decision taking and for joint deliberations. Hence, the opportunity to safeguard the interest is being denied by arcane regulations.
If the U.S government is really interested in the healthy stock market, it should exhibit it by deleting, not adding, regulations and building the market truly free.
Stock Exchange Commission [SEC] supports on an independent, private sector standards setting process mainly through open and deliberate. Though the commission has the statutory authority to frame accounting principles , it has not do so for the last 60 years .Instead it has assigned the onus to the private sector for leadership in establishing and enhancing the accounting standards. It is the private sector standards-setting process, as supervised by the SEC has resulted in existence of a quality accounting standards and strong capital markets in USA as of today.
After the end of the First World War in 1919, there was spurt in investment in securities by investors. Around 1920, more than .02 billion large and small shareholders availed the benefits of post-war affluence and ready to avail sudden wealth from stock market and due to boom, more than $ 50 billion worth in new stock was floated during this time.
The famous stock market crash in 1929 which was notoriously known as Black Friday resulted in loss of faith by investors on the capital markets. Many investors were turned as pauper over a night. It was observed that if at all economy was to recover, the publics confidence on capital market required to be refurbished. Congress was forced to find out a solution for this problem and it held many deliberations on the subject and finally passed the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The prime goal for the establishment of Securities exchange commission was mainly to enforce the fresh security laws, to build confidence, to provide stability to the market and last but not the least to offer protection to investors. Stock Exchange Commission [SEC] was toothed with mandate to formulate accounting principles and standards. It is to be noted that even though SEC was accorded the power to supervise the accounting practice, SEC is of the opinion that the private sector is having ample resources and ability to build up suitable accounting standards.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICPA] had been in the field since 1887. As a federation of state societies, American Society of Certified Public Accountants was established in 1921 and later merged with the Institute during 1936. Due to persuasion from the SEC, the AICPA appointed the committee on accounting procedure in 1939. Committee on Accounting Procedure [CAP] released about 51 accounting research bulletin between 1939 and 1959. Though, these bulletins were able to solve the problems now and then as they emerged but could not address the issues relating to accounting principles.
To resolve the accounting principles issues, AICPA established a new standard setting body in 1959 namely the Accounting Principles Board [APB].The main goal of the APB is to establish appropriate practices, formulate accounting principles and to minimize the discrepancies in practices. Though the APB released about 31 opinions between 1959 and 1973, it was dissolved for absence of productivity.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles [GAAP] are an anthology of conventions, procedures and rules that describe accepted accounting practices. Though it is not accorded as mandatory by any statute, SEC advises that it should be followed in all financial reporting of publicly traded companies. GAAP can thus be explained as a cluster of conventions and objectives that have been developed over time to oversee how financial statements are being prepared and presented. The three nodal authorities viz. the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, The Financial Accounting Standards Boards and Exchange Commission offer regulation concerning acceptable accounting practices.
The GAAP is founded on four basic assumptions as per the details below:
FASBs basic principles are detailed below:
The after effects of Enron, WorldCom, Inc have forced the Congress to enact Sarbanes Oxley Act in 2002. The other accounting reforms announced is the creation of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board [PCAOB] to supervise the audits of the Public companies. PACOB has been entrusted with wide authority to regulate the auditing profession. PACOB has been toothed with powers like imposing civil penalty and to impose permanent revocation of an auditing firms ability to audit public companies.
8, SWITCHING TO PRINCIPLES BASED ACCOUNTING SYSTEM:
There is strong suggestion from various quarters that U.S should abandon the current rules-based system in favor of a principles-based accounting. If that happens, the critics are of the view that all the current difficulties being faced by U.S financial reporting would be alleviated or eliminated. Further section 108 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 202 stipulates that SEC to conduct a study on the adoption of a principle based accounting system. 
Globalization offers both impetus and opportunity and it is time to streamline the FASB guidelines in tune with changing scenario. It is to be noted that FASB has recently issued special report on Leases thereby implementing a new approach, is recognition of the need to review existing standards. Hence it is necessary not only to review its leases guidelines but for all current standards.
The current FASB is high technical and complex in nature and may not help the investing public to understand the same without the guidance of professionals on the subject. When most of the countries around the globe have switched from complex to simpler guidelines, U.S can also follow them. In setting standards on national or global basis, technical correctness is regarded as less important than the comparability among reporting entities.
Globalization in commerce here has become the order of the day and U.S accounting standards must reflect true global interests. Sticking to technically sound accounting standards would not help to develop acceptable, meaningful international standards. FASB should take avail this opportunity to update and even change the standards. The accounting profession and accounting standard setters should unite together in their effort to assure simpler, more beneficial and easy to understand U.S and worldwide accounting standard.
Van Riper, R. 1994, Setting Standards for Financial Reporting: FASB and the Struggle for Control of a Critical Process. CT: Quorum Books. Westport.
Hartgraves, A. L., & Benston, G. J. 2002, The Evolving Accounting Standards for Special Purpose Entities and Consolidations. Accounting Horizons, 16(3), 245+.
Barker, Richard, 2004, Reporting Financial Performance. Accounting Horizons 18, no. 2 157+.
Bekesford, Dennis R. 1999,Its Time to Simplify Accounting Standards. Journal of Accountancy 187, no. 3: 65.
Beresford, Dennis R. 2001,Congress Looks at Accounting for Business Combinations. Accounting Horizons 15, no. 1: 73.
Derieux, Samuel A. 2000,Lets Reassess Accounting Standards. Journal of Accountancy 189, no. 5: 82.
Dye, Ronald A., and Shyam Sunder. 2001,Why Not Allow FASB and IASB Standards to Compete in the U.S.? Accounting Horizons 15, no. 3: 257.
1992,The Financial Accounting Standards Board. Journal of Accountancy 173, no. 6: 4.
Fleming, Peter D. 1991,The Growing Importance of International Accounting Standards; Arthur R. Wyatt, Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Committee Heralds International Harmonization. Journal of Accountancy 172, no. 3 100+.
Gornik-Tomaszewski, Sylwia, and Irene N. McCarthy. 2003,Cooperation between FASB and IASB to Achieve Convergence of Accounting Standards. Review of Business 24, no. 2: 52+.
Hartgraves, Ai L., and George J. Benston. 2002, The Evolving Accounting Standards for Special Purpose Entities and Consolidations. Accounting Horizons 16, no. 3: 245+.
Herrmann, Don, and Ian P.N. Hague. 2006, Convergence: In Search of the Best CPAs Should Understand How U.S. and Foreign Accounting Standards Influence Each Other. Journal of Accountancy 201, no. 1: 69+.
Houston, Melvin, and Alan Reinstein. 2001, International Accounting Standards and Their Implications for Accountants and U.S. Financial Statement Users. Review of Business 22, no. 1: 75.
Monson, Dennis W. 2001, The Conceptual Framework and Accounting for Leases. Accounting Horizons 15, no. 3: 275.
Nobes, Christopher W. 2005,Rules-Based Standards and the Lack of Principles in Accounting. Accounting Horizons 19, no. 1: 25+.
Radig, William J., and Brian Louder milk. 1998,Leading the Way to Uniform Accounting Principles. Review of Business 19, no. 3: 22+.
Schipper, Katherine. 2003, Principles-Based Accounting Standards. Accounting Horizons 17, no. 1: 61+.
Silliman, Benjamin Rue. 2005,Convergence of Accounting Standards: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Revised Standard on Share-Based Payment and the International Accounting Standards Boards IFRS 2. Review of Business 26, no. 2: 24+.
Wyatt, Arthur R., and Joseph F. Yospe. 1993,Wake-Up Call to American Business: International Accounting Standards Are on the Way. Journal of Accountancy 175, no. 7: 80+.
 Encyclopedia Article Title: Accounting. Encyclopedia Title: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Publisher: Columbia University Press. Place of Publication: New York. Publication Year: 2004.
 Article Title: Principles-Based Accounting Standards. Contributors: Katherine Schipper author. Journal Title: Accounting Horizons. Volume: 17. Issue: 1. Publication Year: 2003. Page Number: 61+.
 Article Title: Lets Reassess Accounting Standards. Contributors: Samuel A. Derieux author. Journal Title: Journal of Accountancy. Volume: 189. Issue: 5. Publication Year: 2000. Page Number: 82