Aristotle vs. plato Essay

Published: 2020-04-22 15:25:56
412 words
2 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Causality

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Epistemology, theory of knowledge, is the logic of getting to the metaphysics. Ontology, theory of being, is the very distinct part of metaphysics, where definitional divisions appear even larger than in metaphysics itself. Ontos, a Greek word, which means being and episteme, is a Greek word, which means knowledge of the highest, most reliable and certain kind. For Plato, there exist two worlds: the ever changing material world and the eternal world of Forms. Every material object is modeled after a perfect, eternal Form, but is itself only a flawed, unreal copy.

This is his definition of ontology. Where in Aristotles point of view, material objects are composed of matter (potential with no properties of its own) and form (its sensible qualities). Matter + sensible qualities=four elements. Example: hot: dry, hot: wet, cold: wet, cold: dry. The four elements; fire, air, water and earth. They go from lightest to heaviest. A thing can be described in terms of its four causes. Material cause, the matter making up an object, this is what persists through physical change. Formal cause, the objects sensible qualities, like shape, sixe, color. Agent or efficient cause, what creates or changes the objects, the source of its change.

Final cause, the purpose of the object or the goal of its change. Platos view on epistemology was very, unrealistic, in my point of view. He thinks that we know the material world imperfectly through our senses; we know the world of Forms truly through reason, because the eternal part of us remembers these forms. Our faculty of reason is superior to the senses, but the senses may also help direct our attention to the world of forms. Through Aristotles eyes, material objects are real, and empirical knowledge is true. We come to understand categories of things through our senses, through our experiences of real life examples.

In conclusion, Plato believed there is only one reality behind all of the phenomena in the world, the realm of the Ideal Forms. beieved that a world of Ideas or ideal forms existed apart from human beings. Aristotle, in contrast, argued there are a series of realities. At each level, the individual gets closer to the relationships that reveal true knowledge. Believed that no universals could exist apart from their relationship to human beings. In my point of view, Plato lived in a fantasyland. Where in Aristotle lived in a world that theres a scientific reason behind everything that happening.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read