Method of Casuistry Essay

Published: 2020-01-30 20:11:41
380 words
2 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Critical

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

The existence of bribery in any given industry may be considered as inevitable. Despite its negative nature, it has been part of the worlds history for a very long time and there are still people who practice it. Although most countries agree that those who give and accept bribes are punishable, it becomes a difficult task as there is only a thin line that divides acceptance of bribes from merely acceptance of gifts (Texas A&M University, 2008). In order to resolve the problem in judging acts of bribery and giving punishment, the method of casuistry is utilized.

This method may be considered similar to the one used by judges in deciding court rulings for cases. It includes comparison of the present case with the cases that occurred in the past. It also involves gathering of analogies and disanalogies from both cases and then analysis (Texas A&M University, 2008). In the method of casuistry, an act is determined whether or not it is to be considered as bribery by depending mainly on the facts of the given case.

The decisions of the parties involved in a certain period of time are carefully taken into consideration as well as the gifts or amenities offered and how it was given and accepted. This is done for it may affect the peoples comprehension and judgment of the act that succeeded thereafter. With deeper analysis of these factors, it may be easy to distinguish a simple act of offering and acceptance from acts of bribery (Texas A&M University, 2008). As in many cases of morality in question, the method of casuistry also has drawbacks and criticisms.

For this method heavily relies on peoples judgment that is highly dependent on empirical data, there may be a possible discrepancy in case an evidence is not presented. As such, culpability may be reduced. The huge tendency for people to lie about pieces of evidences may affect the judgment of the act as a whole. The effectiveness of the method is then reduced and the judgment as to whether an act is bribery or not becomes a problem again (Texas A&M University, 2008).


Texas A&M University. (2008). Engineering Ethics. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://ethics. tamu. edu/ethics/giftgive/giftgiv1. htm

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read