But the article starts off with an optimistic note, showing one of the survivors of Hurricane Katrina, whose house once buried deep in muddy water is now pictured in the same house, with new furnitures and freshly painted walls fashioned to look as good as new. The home owner in question, it would turn out, used her personal life savings to have her home get back to looking the way it was and better, and government did not have its hand on the matter. The state of rebuilding in the nearby vicinity, and the rest of New Orleans it would seem, is not going as planned and as in order as that of the previously stated home owner.
The article sheds some probably unwanted light on the governments ineffectiveness: the delay in releasing of funds intended for rebuilding and reconstruction, the critical priority projects which has failed to take its form. For the most part, the article was able to show that civilians and residents were not the only victims affected by the delay in the issuance of funds, police and firefighters are forced to work in trailers, and the citys crime labs have no place to conduct DNA testing and similar laboratory analysis.
But the news article identifies the lower class bracket of being on the receiving end of much of the rebuilding problems as they depend on government funding to assist them in the restoration of their homes, as opposed to middle and upper class individuals who are able and have been able to rebuild using money from their private funds, insurance, and so on.
After the initial pressing issue was shed light on, the article gave brief history and information regarding the root of the devastation, and proceeded to include packets of optimism in the form of interview with civic activists who are volunteering their time and effort into ensuring that improvements can and will be achieved. The news article culminates in the reality that the federal and state government is doing nothing to aid victims of Hurricane Katrina, or if it does, hardly anybody could attest to it. And concludes with the notion that if people are to look for help, they are to find it amongst themselves.
Asked about the instance of rebuilding, people reply with, if it werent for volunteers, if it werent for the private sector¦ nothing would have been done. The news article presented the necessary facts, and although it showed bias towards the survivors of Hurricane Katrinas part, this bias was justified because of the apparent inaction on the side of the government.
Jervis, Rick. 2 Years After Katrina, Pace of Rebuilding Depends on Who Pays. 28 August 2007. USA Today. 11 December 2007.